Skip to main content

I) We live in the Information Age

By
I) The Information Age

I remember being introduced to Mosaic, the first web browser.  I was in university studying Neural Computation and someone demonstrated Mosaic's browser to me.  My first reaction was: now what?  There was no content apparent, nothing to see, and no way to find it.  Then came Yahoo organizing the world for you, followed by AltaVista my first content searchable portal.  Google had the simpler interface, not a portal just a search engine, it was faster and that was that.

Well there was and is more to the two different approaches.  Portals gather, organize and present the data, they feel limiting to me.  While search engines open up the vast potential to explore all the worlds data, freeing me to discover anything.  Perhaps the subtlety is that even search engines guide your search and organize the data for you, we are not as free as we think we are.  Funny that my current behavior is still a mix, I go to Yahoo and Google, but I now also visit the Twitter sphere and Facebook, a mix of personal preferences guiding my formatted data and open search.

Thinking these thoughts as an opener to this blog, partially because revisiting them is fun, life was simpler then, more physical survival less virtual.  However, seems that these two modes of interaction are typical of the struggle with data today.  Too much freedom, pure free search is overwhelming, too little is stifling.  What should we put in the hands of others, how can we guide our path through all this data?

I would like to share tools I have developed to help navigate and survive in the Information Age.  But beyond survive I would like to develop tools with you to thrive and grow with the opportunity.  So here goes...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

V) How do we know we made a reasonable judgement?

By
V) How do we know we made a reasonable judgement? I was by my brother in NY, on my way to the airport, and I spotted a book by Umberto Eco on information and open systems.  I borrowed the book (and still have it -- sorry Jacob),  just on the whim that I would enjoy more Eco in my life.  I discovered much more, the book is Eco's earlier writing, semiotics mixed with art and science, and has had a profound affect on me.  Eco makes the argument that Shannon's description of information, a measure of the communicability of a message, provides for a measure of art. If it helps think about 'On Interpretation' by Susan Sontag, experience art without interpreting it.  There is no message not even one that we the viewer creates.   There is no meaning to be had, just an experience.  The flip side of this argument is that when there is interpretation there is meaning.  This view, proposed by Semiotics, states that when two closed systems meet and are ...
Post a Comment
Read more

0.0 Introduction to advanced concepts in AI and Machine Learning

By
Introduction to advanced concepts in AI and Machine Learning I created a set of short videos and blog posts to introduce some advanced ideas in AI and Machine Learning.  It is easier for me to think about them as I met them, chronologically in my life, but I may revisit the ideas later from a different perspective. I also noticed that one of things I am doing is utilising slightly off-centre tools to describe an idea.  So for example, I employ Kohonen Feature Maps to describe embeddings.  I think I gain a couple of things this way, first it is a different perspective than most people are used to.  In addition, well you will see :-) I recommend first opening the blog entry (as per the links below), then concurrently watching the linked video. Hope you enjoy these as much as I did putting them together, David Here are links: https://data-information-meaning.blogspot.com/2020/12/memorization-learning-and-classification.html https://data-information-meaning.blogspot.com/...
Post a Comment
Read more

III) Metrics

By
III) Metrics One of these things is not like the other -- but two of these things are distant from a third. I grew up with Brisk Torah, more specifically my father was a Talmid of Rabbi Joseph Soloveichik and dialectic thinking was part and parcel of our discussions.  Two things, two dinim, the rhythm in the flow between two things.  Dialectics not dichotomies.  The idea espoused by the Rambam in his description of Love and Awe, mutually exclusive, we travel between them. Why create duality?  Dialectics or dichotomies provide a powerful tool, but what is it that tool? What is the challenge? I think the Rabbinic language might be נתת דברך לשיעורים, 'your words are given to degrees', the idea being that without clear definitions we are left with vague language, something is more than something else, ok, but how much more? This I think is the reasoning for the first of the twenty one questions I was taught by my father's mother, 'is it bigger than a breadbox?',...
Post a Comment
Read more